بهبود زمان واکنش ساده در سالمندان با تحریک شنیداری و ترکیبی گاما: شواهدی از عدم تأثیر بر زمان واکنش افتراقی و انتخابی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم رفتاری و شناختی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی و تندرستی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران

2 گروه روانپزشکی ، بیمارستان شهید بهشتی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، کرمان

چکیده

مقدمه: با افزایش جمعیت سالمندان، افت عملکردهای شناختی - حرکتی از جمله زمان واکنش به‌عنوان یکی از عوامل مهم افزایش خطر سقوط و کاهش استقلال عملکردی مطرح است. زمان واکنش شاخصی کلیدی از سرعت پردازش اطلاعات و پاسخ‌دهی حرکتی محسوب می‌شود. در سال‌های اخیر، تحریکات حسی غیرتهاجمی نظیر ضربان‌های باینورال شنیداری و تحریک ریتمیک دیداری در باند گاما (۴۰ هرتز) به ‌عنوان راهکارهایی نوین برای بهبود عملکردهای شناختی مورد توجه قرار گرفته‌اند. با این حال، شواهد محدودی در مورد اثر ترکیبی آنها بر زمان واکنش سالمندان وجود دارد.
هدف: هدف اصلی این پژوهش، تعیین تاثیر تحریک شنیداری، تحریک دیداری و تحریک ترکیبی (شنیداری+دیداری) در باند گاما (۴۰ هرتز) بر انواع مختلف زمان واکنش (ساده، افتراقی و انتخابی) در سالمندان بود.
روش پژوهش: این مطالعه نیمه‌تجربی با طرح پیش‌آزمون - پس‌آزمون و گروه کنترل بر روی ۴۰ سالمند ۶۰ سال به بالا انجام شد. شرکت‌کنندگان به‌صورت تصادفی به چهار گروه تحریک شنیداری، تحریک دیداری، تحریک ترکیبی (شنیداری+ دیداری) و کنترل تقسیم شدند. مداخله شامل اعمال تحریک ۴۰ هرتز به مدت ۲۰ دقیقه روزانه، طی دو هفته متوالی بود. زمان واکنش ساده، افتراقی و انتخابی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار زمان‌سنج واکنش پیشرفته در مراحل پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون ارزیابی شد. زمان و اکنش ساده و افتراقی با استفاده از تحلیل واریانس مرکب و زمان و اکنش انتخابی با آزمون ویلکاکسون و کروسکال والیس انجام شد.
یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که تحریک شنیداری و ترکیبی (شنیداری+دیداری)  منجر به کاهش معنی‌دار زمان واکنش ساده نسبت به گروه کنترل شد (05/0≥P).  با این حال، در زمان واکنش افتراقی و انتخابی، تفاوت معنی‌داری بین گروه‌ها مشاهده نشد..
نتیجه گیری: یافته‌ها نشان داد که تحریک گامای ۴۰ هرتز، به ویژه از طریق تحریک شنیداری و ترکیبی (شنیداری+دیداری)، منجر به بهبود معنادار زمان واکنش ساده در سالمندان می‌شود (05/0≥P). این مداخله غیرتهاجمی و کم‌هزینه، پتانسیل خود را به عنوان راهکاری برای ارتقاء جنبه‌های خاصی از سرعت پردازش اطلاعات حرکتی نشان می‌دهد. با این حال، عدم مشاهده تأثیر معنادار بر زمان واکنش افتراقی و انتخابی، لزوم تحقیقات بیشتر با پروتکل‌های تعدیل‌شده یا دوره‌های درمانی طولانی‌تر را برای دستیابی به اثرات شناختی پیچیده‌تر برجسته می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Introduction

The aging population is rapidly increasing worldwide, and this demographic shift has highlighted many health and social challenges related to older people, especially in countries like Iran. One of the significant issues in this age group is the decline in cognitive and motor functions, which significantly affects their quality of life. Among these functions, reaction time is a key indicator of the speed of information processing and decision-making in the nervous system. A decline in reaction time in the elderly can increase the risk of falls, mobility disorders, and reduced independence.

Recent studies have shown that non-invasive sensory stimulation techniques, such as binaural beats for auditory stimulation and rhythmic visual stimulation in the gamma band (40 Hz), can be novel approaches to enhance cognitive and motor functions in older adults. Although existing evidence supports the positive effects of these techniques on simple reaction time in elderly populations, there has been limited research on the combined effect of these two stimuli (auditory and visual) on reaction time.

Seeking to broaden the knowledge base regarding sensory stimulation’s influence on cognitive performance, specifically reaction time in aging populations, this research addresses a critical gap. Although prior work has confirmed the benefits of distinct auditory and visual stimuli on simple reaction time, this study offers the first comprehensive, simultaneous evaluation of combined auditory and visual stimulation at 40 Hz gamma frequency on simple, differential, and selective reaction times among older adults, generating novel evidence to fill this void

 

Methods

This quasi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The study involved 40 elderly participants aged 60 and above, who were randomly assigned to one of four groups: auditory stimulation, visual stimulation, combined auditory and visual stimulation, and a control group. The intervention consisted of 40 Hz gamma stimulation for 20 minutes daily over two consecutive weeks.

In the auditory stimulation group, binaural beats at 400 Hz and 440 Hz were delivered to each ear, creating a 40 Hz frequency difference in the brain. In the visual stimulation group, 40 Hz rhythmic light stimuli were used. The combined group received both auditory and visual stimuli simultaneously.

Before the intervention, participants' reaction times—simple, differential, and selective—were measured using advanced reaction time software. These measurements were taken at both pre-test and post-test stages to evaluate any changes in reaction time after the intervention.

Results

The results showed that both auditory and combined (auditory + visual) stimulation significantly reduced simple reaction time compared to the control group (P ≤ 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in differential and selective reaction times between the groups (Table1). These findings suggest that 40 Hz gamma stimulation positively influences simple reaction time in elderly individuals, but for more complex reaction tasks, longer interventions or changes in training conditions may be necessary.

The intervention, comprising daily 20-minute sessions of 40 Hz gamma stimulation over two weeks, demonstrated varied outcomes among the study groups. Key findings from Tukey’s pairwise post-hoc comparisons (detailed in the table below) indicated a significant reduction in reaction times for both the auditory stimulation group and the combined auditory-visual stimulation group. Conversely, within-group analyses for the control group revealed no significant changes in reaction time during these two weeks, a finding possibly attributable to the ineffectiveness of the placebo condition or the lack of active intervention. Furthermore, visual stimulation administered alone did not significantly impact reaction time. This latter outcome might be attributed to the more complex nature of differential and selective reaction tasks, which necessitate higher cognitive processing.

 

 

Table 1: Mean Reaction Times (ms) ± Standard Deviation

Group

Simple Reaction Time (ms)

Differential Reaction Time (ms)

Selective Reaction Time (ms)

Auditory + Visual

236 ± 48

324 ± 92

412 ± 109

Auditory

255 ± 51

325 ± 95

422 ± 108

Visual

267 ± 53

318 ± 89

415 ± 111

Control

334 ± 77

365 ± 107

455 ± 120

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

The findings of this study indicate that 40 Hz gamma stimulation, particularly through auditory and combined auditory-visual stimulation, can improve simple reaction time in elderly individuals. This non-invasive, low-cost intervention can be an effective way to maintain motor function and reduce the risk of falls in elderly populations. However, its impact on more complex reaction tasks, such as differential and selective reaction time, was limited, highlighting the need for longer or more complex interventions to address these processes.

These findings pave the way for further research on the use of multisensory gamma stimulation to enhance cognitive and motor performance in older adults. Additionally, combining different stimulation techniques could offer a new strategy to improve the quality of life, particularly in the mental and physical aspects of elderly individuals.

 

 



Footnotes

Ethical approval

The code of ethics was received from the Research Ethics Committees at Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health University of Tehran, ID IR.UT.SPORT.REC.1404.003.

Funding

No funding has been provided for this  research

Authors’ contribution

  1. Z. Sh: Initial drafting, data collection, methodology review, and editing. Sh. T.B (corresponding author): Methodology review and editing, research supervision, and project management. A: Editing, methodology review, and data analysis F.J: Editing, methodology review, platform management, and initial screening.

Acknowledgments

We are sincerely grateful to all esteemed clients whose active participation in implementing the intervention protocols and tests provided the foundation for the findings of this research. Special thanks and appreciation are extended to the respected personnel of Gohar Salamat Center who facilitated the necessary provisions for the successful execution of the field stages of this research through their administrative cooperation and support.

  1. M Dehghan Banadaki. Study of the status of aging in Iran: Future and challenges. Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly 2023. Report No.: 19086.
  2. Dindar Farkosh J Kazemipour Sabet S, Ansari H. Foresasting the aging trend of the Iranian population in different regions and population groups until 1420 Journal of Future Studies Management. 2022;33(1):103-22
  3. M Moshfegh. Population of the elderly in Iran until 1405 Tehran: Tarh-e Naghd; 2019.
  4. Li KZH Bherer L, Mirelman A, Maidan I, Hausdorff JM. Cognitive Involvement in Balance, Gait and Dual-Tasking in Aging: A Focused Review From a Neuroscience of Aging Perspective. Front Neurol. 2018.doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00913
  5. Eckert MA Keren NI, Roberts DR, Calhoun VD, Harris KC. Age-related changes in processing speed: unique contributions of cerebellar and prefrontal cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010.doi:10.3389/neuro.09.010.2010
  6. Rajabi NF Asgari K, Etemadifar M. An Investigation of the Difference in Reaction Time to Visual and Auditory Stimuli in Two Groups of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy People. Shefa Khatam Journal. 2022;10(3).doi:10.52547/shefa.10.3.13
  7. Taheri M Irandoost K, Yousefi S, Jamali A. Effect of 8-Week Lower Extremity Weight-Bearing Exercise Protocol and Acute Caffeine Consumption on Reaction Time in Postmenopausal Women. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2017;12(1):18-29.doi:10.21859/sija-120116
  8. Bueno GAS do Bomfim AD, Campos LF, Martins AC, Elmescany RB, Stival MM, Funghetto SS, de Menezes RL. Non-invasive neuromodulation in reducing the risk of falls and fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults: systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024;15:1301790.doi:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1301790
  9. Zhong YJ Meng Q, Su CH. Mechanism-Driven Strategies for Reducing Fall Risk in the Elderly: A Multidisciplinary Review of Exercise Interventions. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(23):2394.doi:10.3390/healthcare12232394
  10. D Jiao. Advancing personalized digital therapeutics: integrating music therapy, brainwave entrainment methods, and AI-driven biofeedback. Front Digit Health. 2025;7:1552396.doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1552396
  11. Yousefi AH Zafari M. The Effect of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy and Brainwave Synchronization Induced by Binaural Beats. Master's Thesis, Clinical Sciences, Hamadan Research2022. p. 22.
  12. Mehdizadeh Fanid L., Bayrami, M., Sabouri Moghaddam, H., Hashemi, T., Dadashi, S. Effectiveness of Brainwave Entrainment in Alpha Band on Working Memory, Anti-Saccade and Anxiety Level of Anxious Participants. Journal of Psychological Studies. 2023;19(3):7-20.doi:10.22051/psy.2023.44257.2812
  13. Askarpour H Mirzaee F, Habibi F, Pourfridoni M. Binaural Beats’ Effect on Brain Activity and Psychiatric Disorders: A Literature Review. Open Public Healt. 2024;17:e18749445332258.:doi:10.2174/0118749445332258241008103504
  14. Deng Q Wu C, Parker E, Zhu J, Liu TC, Duan R, Yang L. Mystery of gamma wave stimulation in brain disorders. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2024;19:96(1).doi:10.1186/s13024-024-00785-x.
  15. Rakhshan V Hassani-Abharian P, Joghataei M, Nasehi M, Khosrowabadi R. Effects of the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Binaural Beat Brain Stimulation and Short-Term Training on Simultaneously Assessed Visuospatial and Verbal Working Memories, Signal Detection Measures, Response Times, and Intrasubject Response Time Variabilities: A Within-Subject Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:42.doi:10.1155/2022/8588272
  16. Ingendoh RM Posny ES, Heine A. Binaural beats to entrain the brain? A systematic review of the effects of binaural beat stimulation on brain oscillatory activity, and the implications for psychological research and intervention. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0286023.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286023
  17. Orozco Perez HD Dumas G, Lehmann A. Binaural Beats through the Auditory Pathway: From Brainstem to Connectivity Patterns. eNeuro. 2020;7(2).doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0232-19.2020
  18. Jiao Y Ma J. Effects of Binaural Beat Technology Sound Stimulation Therapy on Recovery in Elderly Patients with CHD Post-PCI: A Retrospective Study. Noise Health. 2025;27(128):783-94.doi:10.4103/nah.nah_96_25
  19. Shang-Yu Yang1 · Pin-Hsuan Lin2 · Jiun-Yi Wang1 3 · Shih-Hau Fu4. Effectiveness of binaural beat music combined with rhythmical photic stimulation on older people with depressive symptoms in long-term care institution: a quasi-experimental pilot study. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research springer. 2024.doi:10.1007/s40520-024-02737-3
  20. Han C., Shapley, R. & Xing, D. Gamma rhythms in the visual cortex: functions and mechanisms. Cogn Neurodyn. 2021;16:745-56.doi:10.1007/s11571-021-09767-x
  21. Mlinarič T Khachatryan E, Wittevrongel B, Dauwe I, Carrette E, Van Roost D, Achten E, Boon P, Meurs A, Van Hulle MM. Visual gamma stimulation induces 40 Hz neural oscillations in the human hippocampus and alters phase synchrony and lag. Commun Biol 2025;8 (1):1301.doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08766-6
  22. Hui Liu Longlong Wang, Shuangyan Li & Guizhi Xu. 40 Hz Light Flicker Stimulation Improves the Behavioral Performance and Hippocampal Neuronal Excitability in Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model. Proceedings of the 1st Electrical Artificial Intelligence Conference. 2025;3:69–78.doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4067-6_8
  23. Aparecido-Kanzler S Cidral-Filho FJ, Prediger RD. Effects of binaural beats and isochronic tones on brain wave modulation: Literature review. Rev Mex Neuroci. 2021;22(6):238-47.doi:10.24875/RMN.20000100
  24. Chen X Shi X, Wu Y, Zhou Z, Chen S, Han Y, Shan C. Gamma oscillations and application of 40-Hz audiovisual stimulation to improve brain function. Brin and Behavior. 2022;12(12):e2811.doi: 10.1002/brb3.2811.
  25. Iaccarino H., Singer, A., Martorell, A. et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature 2016; 540(7632):230–5.doi:10.1038/nature20587
  26. Matthew K. Attokaren Lu Zhang, Sindhura Mettupalli, View ORCID ProfileAnnabelle C. Singer. 40 Hz Audiovisual Stimulation Improves Sustained Attention and Related Brain Oscillation. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025.doi:10.1101/2025.08.25.671937
  27. Getzmann S Falkenstein M, Gajewski PD. Long-term cardiovascular fitness is associated with auditory attentional control in old adults: neuro-behavioral evidence. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):74539.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074539
  28. Bizley JK Nodal FR, Bajo VM, Nelken I, King AJ. Physiological and anatomical evidence for multisensory interactions in auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(9):2172-89.doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl128
  29. Blanco-Duque C Chan D, Kahn MC, Murdock MH, Tsai LH. Audiovisual gamma stimulation or the treatment of urodegeneration. J Intern Med. 2024;295(2):146-70.doi:10.1111/joim.13755
  30. Shin J Chung Y. The effects of treadmill training with visual feedback and rhythmic auditory cue on gait and balance in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;51(3):443-53.doi:10.3233/NRE-220099
  31. Wallace MT Woynaroski TG, Stevenson RA. Multisensory Integration as a Window into Orderly and Disrupted Cognition and Communication. Annu Rev Psychol. 2020.doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051112
  32. Lavanya Shekar Chinmay Ajit Suryavanshi, Kirtana Raghuram Nayak. Effect of alpha and gamma binaural beats on reaction time and short-term memory. 2018.doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.1246506022018
  33. SeyedianM Fallah M, Norouzian M, Nejat S, et.al. Validity of the farsi version of mini-mental state examination. Journal of Medical Council of Iran. 2007;25(4):408-14
  34. Masoumi N Jafaroodi S. Assessment of cognitivestatus of the elderly and its related factors in Rasht [persian]. Nursing Research. 2013;29(8):80-6
  35. Rahmani M Darvishpour A, pourghane P, Atrkarroushan Z. Application of MoCA, MMSE and AMTs tests in diagnosing the cognitive status of the elderly under hemodialysis in Medical centers of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2019. joge. 2020;5(2):64-76
  36. Malekooti S K Mirabzadeh A, Fathollahi P, Salavati M, Kahali S, Afkham Ebrahimi A et al Reliability, Validity and Factor Structure of the GHQ-28 in Iranian Elderly. Salmand Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2006;1(1):11-21
  37. SMR Taghavi. Investigating the Validity and Reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)]. Psychology Journal Shiraz University Iran.20:382-94
  38. Noorbala AA (MD); Bagheri yazdi SA, (MSc); Mohammad K, (PhD). The Validation of General Health Questionnaire- 28 as a Psychiatric Screening Tool. Hakim Research Journal. 2009;11(4):47- 53
  39. Zarei F Mohammadi M, Aboozade Gatabi Kh Ghanbari Moghaddam A. General health and its related factors among elderly in sabzevar 2016. Journal of Gerontology. 2017;2(2).doi:10.29252/joge.2.2.26
  40. Najafi B Arzaqi SM, Fakhrzadeh H, Sharifi F.et. Mental health status of elderly people in Tehran and related factors (A study of health equity assessment and related factors). Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2013;13(1):62-73
  41. Khodadadi M Amani H. Advanced Reaction Time software. Tehran: Sina Cognitive Behavioral Sciences Research Institute; 2014. Available from: https://www.sinapsycho.com. 2014
  42. Azhdar M Mirzakhani N, Irani A, Akbarzadeh Baghban AR, Daryabor A, Sangi S, et al. The Effect of Balance Training on Cognitive and Occupational Performance of the Elderly. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2022;24(1):41-9.doi:10.22088/jbums.24.1.41
  43. Ershad N Rezayi S, Sharifidaramadi P, Farrokhi N. Development and validation of a neurocognitive rehabilitation program andevaluation of its efficacy on reaction time, recognition of shape, and visual-spatial memory in high-functioning male adolescentswith autism. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2024;10(6):27-44.doi:10.32595/shenakht.10.6.27
  44. Han C., Zhao, X., Li, M. et al. Enhancement of the neural response during 40 Hz auditory entrainment in closed-eye state in human prefrontal region. Cogn Neurodyn 2023;17:399–410.doi:10.1007/s11571-022-09834-x
  45. McNett SD Vyshedskiy A, Savchenko A, Durakovic D, Heredia G, Cahn R, Kogan M. A Feasibility Study of AlzLife 40 Hz Sensory Therapy in Patients with MCI and Early AD. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 11(14):2040.doi:10.3390/healthcare11142040. PMID: 37510481;
  46. i Zheng T Huang Y, Sugino M. After-effects of Parieto-occipital Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Behavioral Performance and Neural Activity in Visuo-spatial Attention Task. bioRxiv 2024.doi:10.1101/2024.10.06.616926
  47. Antonenko D Faxel M, Grittner U, Lavidor M, Flöel A. Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Cognitive Functions in Healthy Young and Older Adults. Neural Plast. 2016.doi:10.1155/2016/4274127
  48. Herrmann CS Strüber D, Helfrich RF, Engel AK. EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016;103:12-21.doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.003
  49. Jensen O Kaiser J, Lachaux JP Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(7):317-24.doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.001
  50. Stauch BJ Peter A, Schuler H, Fries P. Stimulus-specific plasticity inhuman visual gamma-band activity and functional connectivity. Elife. 2021:e68240.doi:10.7554/eLife.68240
  51. Cabeza R Albert M, Belleville S, Craik FIM, et al. Maintenance, reserve and compensation the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(11):701-10.doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2
  52. Park DC Reuter-Lorenz P. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009.doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656
  53. Chan D Suk HJ, Jackson BL, Milman NP, Stark D, Klerman EB, Kitchener E, Fernandez Avalos VS, de Weck G, Banerjee A, Beach SD, Blanchard J, Stearns C, Boes AD, Uitermarkt B, Gander P, Howard M 3rd, Sternberg EJ, Nieto-Castanon A, Anteraper S, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Brown EN, Boyden ES, Dickerson BC, Tsai LH. Gamma frequency sensory stimulation in mild probable Alzheimer's dementia patients: Results of feasibility and pilot studies. PLoS One. 2022;17(12).doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278412
  54. Woods DL Wyma JM, Yund EW,, B Herron TJ and Reed. Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9.doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131