Journal of Healthy Ageing and Exercise

Journal of Healthy Ageing and Exercise

The Effect of Central Vision Loss on balance and locomotion in older adults: A Systematic Review

Document Type : Review

Author
Department of Sport Coaching, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.22059/jhae.2026.412475.1038
Abstract
Introduction: Vision plays a crucial role in postural control and movement. This study aims to review the existing knowledge regarding the impact of central vision loss on balance and locomotion patterns in the older adult population.
Methods: In this systematic review, research literature related to visual impairments and motor control was searched. The primary focus was on studies evaluating postural sway, gait strategies, and fall risk in older adults with central vision deficits.
Results: The findings indicate that central vision loss significantly increases postural sway and reduces stability in dynamic situations. Older adults with central vision loss employ cautious gait strategies such as reduced walking speed and increased double-support time to compensate for deficits in detail perception and depth estimation. Furthermore, these individuals face serious challenges in detecting and navigating obstacles, which increases the likelihood of falls and the fear of falling.
Conclusion: Central vision is essential for fine motor adjustments and safe navigation in the environment. Rehabilitation interventions should focus not only on visual enhancement but also on strengthening proprioceptive and vestibular systems, alongside environmental modifications, to maintain mobility independence in older adults.
Keywords
Subjects

Introduction

Visual information is a fundamental component of postural control and locomotion, particularly in older adults. Central vision loss (CVL), commonly caused by conditions such as age-related macular degeneration, leads to a reduction in high-acuity visual input while peripheral vision remains relatively intact. This visual impairment forces individuals to adopt compensatory strategies during mobility tasks. The present review aims to synthesize evidence regarding the effects of central vision loss on balance, gait, obstacle negotiation, and visually guided locomotion in older adults, with a focus on behavioral and biomechanical adaptations.

Methods

This review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed in major scientific databases from inception to February 2026. Studies were included if they investigated older adults (≥60 years) with central vision loss or used simulation paradigms of central vision impairment in healthy participants. Eligible studies needed to report outcomes related to balance, gait, obstacle avoidance, visually guided walking, or eye movement behavior during locomotion tasks. Due to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively.

Results

The review identified consistent evidence that central vision loss leads to significant changes in visually guided locomotion. Individuals with CVL demonstrated reduced walking speed, increased cautious gait patterns, and greater reliance on peripheral vision during mobility tasks. Studies on obstacle negotiation have shown that individuals with CVL tend to overestimate obstacle height and adopt larger safety margins during stepping, indicating compensatory strategies to reduce the risk of falling.

Eye movement behavior was also markedly altered. Older adults with CVL exhibited closer fixation patterns, increased dependence on near-field visual information, and reduced look-ahead behavior during walking. Chapman and Hollands (2006) reported that individuals at higher fall risk demonstrated premature gaze transfer, shifting visual attention away from targets before completing stable foot contact, which was associated with increased stepping variability. Similarly, Yamada et al. (2012) showed that individuals with a history of falls or higher fall risk exhibited earlier gaze shifts in dual-task conditions, reflecting less stable visuomotor planning strategies.

In addition, studies investigating simulated central vision loss confirmed similar compensatory behaviors in healthy participants, including increased toe clearance, altered gait kinematics, and reduced visual field utilization efficiency. Interventional studies suggested that training programs and sensory substitution devices may partially improve mobility performance, although outcomes varied depending on task complexity and cognitive load.

Conclusions

Central vision loss significantly alters locomotor behavior by shifting control strategies from proactive to more reactive mechanisms. This is reflected in reduced anticipatory gaze behavior, increased gait conservatism, and modified obstacle avoidance strategies. Both clinical and simulation-based studies consistently indicate that visual degradation leads to increased reliance on peripheral visual input and altered visuomotor coordination. However, the effectiveness of assistive technologies and training interventions remains variable. Future research should focus on standardized methodologies and longitudinal designs to better understand adaptive mechanisms and optimize rehabilitation strategies for individuals with central vision loss.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no financial support from any organization.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

AI use disclosure

The authors declare that no generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools were used in the preparation, writing, analysis, or revision of this manuscript.

1.       United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). World population ageing 2013 report, New York, NY. 2013
2.       World Health Organization. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age, Geneva, Switzerland. 2007.  
3.       Aitken, L.M., Burmeister, E., Lang, J., Chaboyer, W., Richmond, T.S. Characteristics and outcomes of injured older adults after hospital admission. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2010; 58, 442-449.
4.       Rantakokko, M., Manty, M., Rantanen, T. Mobility decline in old age. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2013; 41, 19-25
5.       Moreland, J.D., Richardson, J.A., Goldsmith, C.H., Clase, C.M. Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.  2004; 52, 1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52310.x
6.       Holtzer, R., Friedman, R., Lipton, R.B., Katz, M., Xue, X., Verghese, J. The
relationship between specific cognitive functions and falls in aging. Neuropsychology. 2007;
21, 540-548.
7.       Franz, J.R., Francis, C.A., Allen, M.S., O’Connor, S.M., Thelen, D.G. Advanced age brings a greater reliance on visual feedback to maintain balance during walking. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2015; 40, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.012.
8.       Uiga, L., Cheng, K.C., Wilson, M.R., Masters, R.S.W., Capio, C.M. Acquiring visual
information for locomotion by older adults: a systematic review. Ageing Res. Rev. 2015;
20, 24–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2014.12.005 
9.       Patla, A.E. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait & Posture. 1997; 5, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01109-5.
10.   Patla, A.E. Visual control of human locomotion. In: Patla, A.E. (Ed.), Advances in Psychology, Adaptability of Human Gait. North-Holland. 1991; pp. 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60738-4.
11.   Berg, W.P., Alessio, H.M., Mills, E.M., Tong, C. Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. Age and Ageing. 1997; 26, 261-268
12.   Templer, J., Archea, J., Cohen, H.H. Study of factors associated with risk of workrelated stairway falls. Journal of Safety Research. 1985; 16, 183-196.
13.   Coleman, A.L., Stone, K., Ewing, S.K., Nevitt, M., Cummings, S., Cauley, J.A., Ensrud, K.E., Harris, E.L., Hochberg, M.C., Mangione, C.M. Higher risk of multiple falls
among elderly women who lose visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111, 857-862
14. Cloutier, DeLucia. Impact of Central Vision Loss on Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance while Walking. Journal of Safety Research. 2022; 99(12): 890–899. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001960 
15.   Cleveland Clinic. Common Eye Diseases and Vision Problems; 2022. 2022; Available at: https://
my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17130-eye-diseases
. Accessed November 4,
16.   Taylor DJ, Hobby AE, Binns AM, Crabb DP. How Does Age-Related Macular Degeneration Affect
Real-World Visual Ability and Quality Of Life? A Systematic Review. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:e011504.
17.   Hansen, D.W., Ji, Q. In the eye of the beholder: a survey of models for eyes and gaze. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. Age and Ageing. 2010; 32, 478-500.
18.   Vater C, Kredel R, Hossner EJ. Detecting Target Changes in Multiple Object Tracking with Peripheral Vision: More Pronounced Eccentricity Effects for Changes in Form than in Motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017;43:903.
19.   Alexander MS, Lajoie K, Neima DR, et al. Effect of Ambient Light and Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Precision Walking. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91:990–9.
20.   Maidenbaum S, Hanassy S, Abboud S, et al. The “Eyecane”, a New Electronic Travel Aid for the Blind: Technology, Behavior & Swift Learning. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014; 32:813–24. [PubMed: 25201814]
21.   Soong GP, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Brown B. Does Mobility Performance of Visually Impaired Adults Improve Immediately after Orientation and Mobility Training? Optom Vis Sci. 2001; 78:657–66. [PubMed: 11587200]
22.   van Rheede JJ, Wilson IR, Qian RI, et al. Improving Mobility Performance in Low Vision With a
Distance-Based Representation of the Visual Scene. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56:4802.
23. Crossland MD, Culham LE, Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS. Preferred Retinal Locus Development In Patients With Macular Disease. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1579–85. [PubMed: 16087239]
24.   Crossland MD, Crabb DP, Rubin GS. Task-Specific Fixation Behavior in Macular Disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:411–6.
25. Lei H, Schuchard RA. Using Two Preferred Retinal Loci for Different Lighting Conditions in Patients with Central Scotomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:1812–8.
26.   Freeman Paul B., Jose RT. The Art and Practice of Low Vision, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997.
27. Bernard JB, Chung ST. Visual Acuity Is Not the Best at the Preferred Retinal Locus in People with Macular Disease. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95:829–36.
28. Bach-y-Rita P, Kercel SW. Sensory Substitution and the Human-Machine Interface. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:541–6.
29.   Salimiaghdam N, Riazi-Esfahani M, Fukuhara PS, et al. Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): A Review on Its Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Open Ophthalmol J. 2019;13:90–9.
30.   Bradshaw SE, Gala S, Nanavaty M, et al. Systematic Literature Review of Treatments for Management of Complications of Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:104. [PubMed: 27401800]
31. Maniglia M, Visscher KM, Seitz AR. Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:734970. [PubMed: 34803584]
32. Owsley C, McGwin G. Driving and Age-Related Macular Degeneration. J Vis Impair Blind. 2008;102:621–35.
33.   Galna, B., Peters, A., Murphy, A.T., Morris, M.E. Obstacle crossing deficits in older adults: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009; 30, 270-275
34.   Barbieri, F.A., Vitório, R., Santos, P.C.R.d., Gobbi, L.T.B. Systematic review of the effect of aging on the free and adaptive gait. Revista da Educação Física/UEM. 2013; 24,
135-143.
35.   Higuchi, T. Visuomotor control of human adaptive locomotion: understanding the
anticipatory nature. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013; 4.
36.   Alhasan, H., Hood, V., Mainwaring, F. The effect of visual biofeedback on balance in elderly population: a systematic review. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2017; 12, 487–497. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S127023.
37.   Cano Porras, D., Siemonsma, P., Inzelberg, R., Zeilig, G., Plotnik, M. Advantages of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of balance and gait: systematic review. Neurology. 2018; 90, 1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005603.
38.   Fang, Q., Ghanouni, P., Anderson, S.E., Touchett, H., Shirley, R., Fang, F., Fang, C. Effects of exergaming on balance of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Games Health J. 2020; 9, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2019.0016
39.   Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339. 2009; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.
40.   Alexander MS, Lajoie K, Neima DR, et al. Effects of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Ambient Light on Curb Negotiation. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:975–89.
41.   Timmis MA, Pardhan S. Patients with Central Visual Field Loss Adopt a Cautious Gait Strategy During Tasks That Present a High Risk of Falling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:4120–9.
42.   Hassan SE, Geruschat DR, Turano KA. Head Movements While Crossing Streets: Effect of Vision Impairment. Optometry Vision Sci. 2005;82:18–26
43.   Geruschat DR, Hassan SE, Turano KA, et al. Gaze Behavior of the Visually Impaired During Street Crossing. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83:550–8.
44.   Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Laderman DJ, et al. Measuring the Effectiveness of Bioptic Telescopes for Persons with Central Vision Loss. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:101–8.
45.   Almutleb ES, Hassan SE. The Effect of Simulated Central Field Loss on Street-crossing DecisionMaking in Young Adult Pedestrians. Optom Vis Sci. 2020; 97:229–38.
46.   O’Brien EE, Mohtar AA, Diment LE, Reynolds KJ.  A Detachable Electronic Device for Use with a Long White Cane to Assist with Mobility. Assist TechnolShelley. 2014; 26:219–26. [PubMed: 25771607]
47.   Turano KA, Geruschat DR, Baker FH. Fixation Behavior while Walking: Persons with Central Visual Field Loss. Vision Res. 2002; 42:2635–44.
48.   Timmis MA, Scarfe AC, Pardhan S. How Does The Extent of Central Visual Field Loss Affect Adaptive Gait? Gait Posture. 2016; 44:55–60.
49.   van Rheede JJ, Wilson IR, Qian RI, et al. Improving Mobility Performance in Low Vision With a Distance-Based Representation of the Visual Scene. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56:4802.
50.   Graber M, Hassan SE. The Mind Cannot Go Blind: Effects of Central Vision Loss on Judging One’s Crossing Time. Optom Vis Sci. 2020; 97:406–15.
51.   Kuyk T, Liu L, Elliott J, Fuhr P. Visual Search Training and Obstacle Avoidance in Adults with Visual Impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2010;104:215–27.
52.   Neugebauer A, Rifai K, Getzlaff M, Wahl S. Navigation Aid for Blind Persons by VisualTo-Auditory Sensory Substitution: A Pilot Study. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15:e0237344.
53.   Legge GE, Beckmann PJ, Tjan BS, et al. Indoor Navigation by People with Visual Impairment Using a Digital Sign System. PloS ONE. 2013; 8
54.   Kim JH, Park JE, Ji IH, et al. Development of a Visual Information to Auditory Information Transformation System for Ambulation Assistance. Technol Health Care. 2019; 27:165–73.
55.   Turano KA, Yu D, Hao L, Hicks JC. Optic-Flow and Egocentric-Direction Strategies In Walking: Central vs. Peripheral Visual Field. Vision Res; 2005. 45:3117–32
56.   Hassan SE, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Woods RL. Vision and Mobility Performance of Subjects with
Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:697–707
57.   Di Fabio, R.P., Emasithi, A., Greany, J.F., Paul, S. Suppression of the vertical
vestibulo-ocular reflex in older persons at risk of falling. Acta Otolaryngologica. 2001; 121,
707-714.
58.    Itoh, N., Fukuda, T. Comparative study of eye movements in extent of central and
peripheral vision and use by young and elderly walkers. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2002;
94, 1283-1291
59.   Paquette, M.R., Vallis, L.A. Age-related kinematic changes in late visual-cueing
during obstacle circumvention. Experimental Brain Research. 2010; 203, 563-574.
60.   Petrofsky, J.S., Bweir, S., Andal, A., Chavez, J., Crane, A., Saunders, J., Laymon, M. Joint acceleration during gait in relation to age. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004; 92, 254-262.
61.   Di Fabio, R.P., Zampieri, C., Greany, J.F. Aging and saccade-stepping interactions in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2003a; 339, 179-182.
62.   Kasahara, S., Okabe, S., Nakazato, N., Ohno, Y. Eye movement patterns of the elderly during stair descent: Effect of illumination. Journal of Light and Visual Environment. 2007; 31, 134-140
63.   Zietz, D., Hollands, M.A. Gaze behavior of young and older adults during stair
walking. J. Mot. Behav. 2009; 41, 357-365.
64.   Di Fabio, R.P., Greany, J.F., Zampieri, C. Saccade-stepping interactions revise the
motor plan for obstacle avoidance. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2003b; 35, 383-397.
65.   Di Fabio, R.P., Zampieri, C., Henke, J., Olson, K., Rickheim, D., Russell, M. Influence of elderly executive cognitive function on attention in the lower visual field during step initiation. Gerontology. 2005; 51, 94-107
66.   Chapman, G.J., Hollands, M.A. Evidence for a link between changes to gaze behaviour and risk of falling in older adults during adaptive locomotion. Gait and Posture. 2006; 24, 288-294 
67.   Young, W.R., Hollands, M.A. Can telling older adults where to look reduce falls?
Evidence for a causal link between inappropriate visual sampling and suboptimal stepping performance. Experimental Brain Research. 2010; 204, 103-113
68.    Yamada, M., Tanaka, H., Mori, S., Nagai, K., Uemura, K., Tanaka, B., Aoyama, T., Ichihashi, N. Fallers choose an early transfer gaze strategy during obstacle avoidance in dual-task condition. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2011; 23, 316-319
69.   Yamada, M., Higuchi, T., Mori, S., Uemura, K., Nagai, K., Aoyama, T., Ichihashi, N. Maladaptive turning and gaze behavior induces impaired stepping on multiple footfall targets during gait in older individuals who are at high risk of falling. Archives of
Gerontology and Geriatrics
. 2012; 54, e102-e108.
70.   Buchs G, Simon N, Maidenbaum S, Amedi A. Waist-Up Protection for Blind Individuals Using the Eyecane As a Primary and Secondary Mobility Aid. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35:225–35. [PubMed: 28157111]
71.   Chebat D-R, Maidenbaum S, Amedi A. The Transfer of Non-Visual Spatial Knowledge Between Real and Virtual Mazes Via Sensory Substitution. In: 2017 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). Montreal, QC, Canada, June 19–22, 2017. IEEE; 2017:1–7.
72.   Shelley EJ, Madigan MC, Natoli R, et al. Cone Degeneration in Aging and Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:483–92.
73.   Matsuda Y, Kawauchi A, Motooka N. 2021. Gazing Behavior Exhibited by People with Low Vision while Navigating Streets. J Asian Archit Build Eng; 20:414–27.
74.   Freedman A, Achtemeier J, Baek Y, Legge GE. Gaze Behavior during Navigation with Reduced Acuity. Exp Eye Res. 2019; 183:20–8.
75.   Targher S, Occelli V, Zampini M. Audiovisual Integration in Low Vision Individuals. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50:576–82.
76.   Targher S, Micciolo R, Occelli V, Zampini M. The Role of Temporal Disparity on Audiovisual Integration in Low-Vision Individuals. Perception. 2017; 46:1356–70.
77.   Bosse, I., Oberlander, K.D., Savelberg, H.H., Meijer, K., Bruggemann, G.P., Karamanidis, K. Dynamic stability control in younger and older adults during stair descent. Human Movement Science. 2012; 31, 1560-1570.
78.   Winter, D.A. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait
and Posture.
1995; 3, 193-214.
79.   Anson, E., Ma, L., Meetam, T., Thompson, E., Rathore, R., Dean, V., Jeka, J. Trunk motion visual feedback during walking improves dynamic balance in older adults: assessor blinded randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture; 2018. 62, 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.044.
80.   Lin, H.W., Bhattacharyya, N. Balance disorders in the elderly: epidemiology and functional impact. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122, 1858–1861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ lary.23376.
81.   Hu, M.H., Woollacott, M.H. Multisensory training of standing balance in older adults: I. Postural stability and one-leg stance balance. J. Gerontol. 1994; 49, M52–M61. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.2.M52
82.   Toby C.T. Mak, Thomson W.L. Wong, Shamay S.M. Ng. Visual-related training to improve balance and walking ability in older adults: A systematic review. Experimental Gerontology. 2021; 156 (2021). 111-131.
83.   Schwenk, M., Grewal, G.S., Honarvar, B., Schwenk, S., Mohler, J., Khalsa, D.S., Najaf, B. Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: a pilot study in older adults. J. Neuroeng. Rehab. 2014. 11, 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-164
Volume 2, Issue 2
Summer 2026
Pages 1-23

  • Receive Date 11 April 2026
  • Revise Date 25 July 2026
  • Accept Date 05 August 2026
  • Publish Date 23 August 2026